Why This Passage Is Difficult
John 20:17 raises a question because Jesus does more than tell Mary not to touch Him. He immediately gives a reason for the command: He has “not yet ascended” to His Father.
That connection is what makes the verse difficult. Why would Jesus’ coming ascension have anything to do with whether Mary touched Him?
Browse more content about John 20:17.
Some have taught that Mary would have defiled or corrupted Jesus if she touched Him before He ascended. A more detailed form of that interpretation says Jesus first had to ascend into heaven and present His physical blood in connection with the heavenly sanctuary before human contact could be permitted.
Those explanations try to take Jesus’ words about the ascension seriously. But before accepting any explanation, we need to ask what John 20 actually says, what the surrounding context shows, and how other resurrection passages fit with it. The Approved Research specifically requires the prohibition, the unfinished ascension, and Mary’s immediate commission to be kept together.
Primary Passage
John 20:17 “Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.”
There are three parts of Jesus’ statement that we cannot separate.
First, He says, “Touch me not.”
Second, He explains, “for I am not yet ascended to my Father.”
Third, He redirects Mary: “but go to my brethren.”
So the question is not merely, “What does touch mean?” The real question is why His not-yet-completed ascension explains the command, and why He immediately sends Mary away with a message.
Immediate Context
Mary Magdalene came to the sepulchre on resurrection morning and discovered that the stone had been taken away. She believed that the Lord’s body had been removed. Peter and the other disciple came and examined the tomb, but Mary remained outside weeping.
Even when Jesus appeared, she did not recognize Him at first. She supposed Him to be the gardener and was still thinking in terms of finding and recovering Jesus’ body.
Then Jesus called her by name.
Mary recognized Him.
That is the immediate setting of “Touch me not.”
Mary had gone from believing that Jesus was gone to suddenly realizing that He was standing there alive. Immediately after that recognition, Jesus stopped her present interaction with Him and gave her something else to do.
John 20:18 records that Mary then went to the disciples and reported that she had seen the Lord and that He had spoken these things to her.
That sequence matters:
Mary recognizes Jesus. Jesus says, “Touch me not.” Jesus explains that He has not yet ascended. Jesus says, “but go.” Mary goes.
The command is therefore part of a very specific resurrection-morning encounter. It should not first be treated as an isolated doctrinal statement about heavenly sacrifice or ceremonial contamination.
What the Passage Actually Says
The first thing we should notice is what the verse states explicitly.
Jesus really does say, “Touch me not.” We should not weaken the command or pretend that physical contact has nothing to do with the verse.
But the verse does not tell us exactly what Mary was doing physically. It does not tell us whether she had already touched Him, was reaching toward Him, or was maintaining some kind of contact. We should not turn one of those possibilities into a certainty.
The second thing we should notice is the word “for.”
Jesus says, “Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father.”
The ascension is not an unrelated comment. Jesus Himself connects His command with the fact that He has not yet ascended.
That means any explanation that ignores the ascension is incomplete.
The third important expression is “not yet.”
That establishes chronology. Jesus is alive from the dead, but something is still ahead. He has “not yet ascended.”
Then, in the same verse, He tells Mary to announce, “I ascend unto my Father.”
The movement is clear:
He has not yet ascended. He is going to ascend. Mary is to tell His brethren about it.
Resurrection morning was therefore not the end of the sequence.
There was still a movement toward the Father ahead.
Finally, notice “but go.”
Jesus does not simply tell Mary what not to do. He immediately tells her what she is to do instead.
“Touch me not” is followed by “but go to my brethren.”
Mary’s commission is therefore part of the passage and must be part of the explanation.
Key Words or Phrases
The exact KJV phrase is “Touch me not.”
That wording should be allowed to stand.
Sometimes the command is explained as though the text specifically said that Mary was clinging to Jesus or refusing to let Him go. That may be possible, but the KJV does not explicitly state that. We should not replace “Touch me not” with a more detailed physical description and then treat that description as proven.
Neither does the word “touch” itself mean “defile.”
John 20:17 does not say that Mary was unclean, that her touch would contaminate Jesus, or that His risen body could be corrupted.
The most important words for interpreting the sentence may actually be the smaller connecting words:
“for” connects the prohibition with the ascension.
“yet” tells us that the sequence is unfinished.
Explore more TWBC teaching in Bible Studies.
“but” redirects Mary from her present action to another one.
The structure of the verse is therefore:
“Touch me not” → “for I am not yet ascended” → “but go” → “I ascend.”
That whole movement has to remain intact.
Competing Interpretations
One serious interpretation says that Mary could not touch Jesus because He had not yet completed a necessary heavenly priestly action.
The strongest form of this view does not merely say, “Mary would have corrupted Jesus.” It connects John 20:17 with biblical teaching concerning Christ’s priesthood, His blood, and heavenly realities, particularly in Hebrews 9.
The reasoning is understandable.
Jesus says He has “not yet ascended.” Hebrews teaches genuine truths about Christ as High Priest, His blood, His entrance into heaven, and His priestly work. Later resurrection passages permit physical contact. Therefore, someone may conclude that Jesus ascended after speaking to Mary, completed a heavenly presentation connected with His blood, returned to earth, and could then be touched.
That interpretation has a strength: it tries to explain why Jesus used the word “for.”
But it also requires several things that John 20:17 never states.
John does not say that Mary was unclean.
John does not say her touch would defile Jesus.
John does not mention His blood in this verse.
John does not mention a mercy seat.
John does not record Jesus immediately ascending, returning to earth, and then continuing His resurrection appearances.
So while Hebrews does establish real heavenly priestly truths, the research did not establish that those truths require this particular resurrection-morning chronology.
A second interpretation emphasizes Mary’s immediate mission. Jesus has risen, Mary has found Him alive, but she cannot simply remain there. She must go tell His brethren.
That fits the immediate context very well.
But even that explanation cannot be reduced to, “Mary just needed to hurry.”
Why?
Because Jesus specifically says, “for I am not yet ascended to my Father.”
His coming ascension must mean something in the explanation.
The strongest reading therefore keeps both ideas together: the sequence is unfinished, and Mary has an immediate responsibility within that unfolding sequence.
Strongest Objection or Apparent Tension
The strongest objection is actually contained in John 20:17 itself.
If Jesus were simply telling Mary to go deliver a message, why did He mention His ascension?
Why say:
“Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father”?
That is a legitimate question, and we should not pretend the verse gives us every intermediate detail.
The heavenly-presentation interpretation offers a very specific answer: something had to happen in heaven first.
But there is another problem that must also be considered.
Other resurrection passages show that physical contact with the risen Jesus was possible.
Matthew 28:9 records women physically taking hold of the risen Christ. John 20:27 records Jesus permitting Thomas the physical examination that Thomas had demanded.
Those passages make it very difficult to say that the resurrected body of Jesus simply could not be touched by a human being.
A defender of the heavenly-presentation interpretation can respond that Jesus may have ascended and returned between Mary’s encounter and those later contacts.
That is logically possible.
But the Approved Research found no passage that explicitly records such an ascent and return between John 20:17 and the later resurrection appearances.
So we should distinguish between something that could be imagined and something Scripture actually requires.
Scripture Harmony
The strongest harmony begins with the Gospel of John itself.
Long before resurrection morning, Jesus had repeatedly told His disciples that He was going to the Father.
John 13:1 and John 13:3 establish that movement toward the Father as part of the larger narrative. John 14:28 again speaks of Jesus going to the Father. John 16:28 describes His coming from the Father into the world and His departure from the world to the Father. John 17:11 continues that same expectation.
So when Jesus tells Mary, “I ascend unto my Father,” He is not suddenly introducing an unknown idea.
He is continuing something He had already told His disciples would happen.
Then Scripture later records His ascension in Luke 24:49-51.
That gives us a straightforward biblical sequence:
Jesus rises from the dead.
Mary encounters Him before He has ascended.
Jesus continues appearing to His disciples.
Physical contact with Him is possible in other resurrection encounters.
Then Scripture records His ascension.
That sequence allows all of those passages to retain their natural force without requiring us to insert an otherwise unrecorded ascent and return.
Matthew 28:9 is especially important because it shows actual physical contact with the risen Jesus. John 20:27 reinforces the same general point by showing that Jesus’ risen body was available for physical verification.
Therefore “Touch me not” should not be turned into a universal rule that no human being could touch the risen Christ.
The difference lies in Mary’s particular encounter and its place in the unfolding sequence.
At the same time, we should not go farther than Scripture goes. The Bible clearly tells us that Jesus’ coming ascension mattered. It does not explicitly tell us every detail of why Mary’s particular physical response was inappropriate at that exact moment.
That limitation should remain.
Best-Supported Conclusion
The best-supported reading of John 20:17 is that “Touch me not” was a temporary, situational command given during an unfinished resurrection-to-ascension sequence.
Mary had believed Jesus was gone. Suddenly she discovered that He was alive and standing before her. But His resurrection appearance was not the final stage of His movement to the Father.
Jesus said:
John 20:17 “Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.”
He had risen, but He had “not yet ascended.”
Mary therefore was not to remain occupied with Him in that present encounter. Jesus redirected her: “but go to my brethren.” She had something to do within the unfolding sequence. She was to carry His message.
Other resurrection passages show that physical contact with the risen Christ was not inherently forbidden. That substantially weakens the idea that Mary’s ordinary human touch would necessarily defile or corrupt Jesus.
John 20:17 also does not establish that Jesus was about to make a secret ascent to carry His physical blood to a heavenly mercy seat before returning to earth. Hebrews teaches genuine truths about Christ’s blood and heavenly priesthood, but the Approved Research did not establish that specific chronology from those passages.
So the safest conclusion is also the one that stays closest to what John actually gives us:
Jesus’ command was connected with timing, transition, and His coming ascension, and Mary was immediately redirected to the responsibility He gave her.
We can confidently say what the passage establishes.
We should also be willing to stop where Scripture stops.
Jesus tells us that the fact He had “not yet ascended” mattered. He does not tell us every intermediate detail of why Mary’s particular touch was inappropriate at that moment. We do not need to invent those missing details in order to understand the main movement of the passage.
