Exodus 25:5
And rams' skins dyed red, and badgers' skins, and shittim wood,
Read in context →Begin with the exact English word as it appears in the King James Bible. Follow its whole-Bible usage, book distribution, related indexed forms, Webster 1828, every occurrence, and the occurrence-specific Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek mappings behind it.
And rams' skins dyed red, and badgers' skins, and shittim wood,
Read in context →O my people, remember now what Balak king of Moab consulted, and what Balaam the son of Beor answered him from Shittim unto Gilgal; that ye may know the righteousness of the LORD.
Read in context →26 occurrences in 26 verses.
Browse those occurrences →This is exact English-word usage from the canonical KJV token index, not a Strong's estimate.
These relationships come from exact verse + token-position mappings. We do not assume that one English spelling always equals one Strong's number. A single English token can also carry more than one source tag, so the Strong's-link total can exceed the number of English occurrences.
shiṭṭâh · shit-taw'
the acacia (from its scourging thorns)
Strong's KJV usage: shittah, shittim. See also 1029.
Strong's first: Exodus 25:5Strong's last: Deuteronomy 10:3
Open full H7848 profile →Shiṭṭîym · shit-teem'
Shittim, a place East of the Jordan
Strong's KJV usage: Shittim.
Strong's first: Numbers 25:1Strong's last: Micah 6:5
Open full H7851 profile →Strong's data is a concordance/lexical reference layer. Scripture context controls interpretation. Lexical source data is shown separately from future TWBC editorial teaching.
26 occurrences match the current filters. Each row keeps its exact KJV token position so Original Word and TSK remain occurrence-specific.
And he made the staves of shittim wood, and overlaid them with brass.
Dictionary data is kept visibly separate from Scripture and from lexical Strong's data.
No Webster 1828 entry was found for this exact KJV form or its conservative base-form candidates.
Curated TWBC teaching will remain a separate editorial layer. Raw source data is never silently rewritten to force a doctrinal conclusion.