Genesis 10:22
The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram.
Read in context →Begin with the exact English word as it appears in the King James Bible. Follow its whole-Bible usage, book distribution, related indexed forms, Webster 1828, every occurrence, and the occurrence-specific Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek mappings behind it.
The children of Shem; Elam, and Asshur, and Arphaxad, and Lud, and Aram.
Read in context →Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
Read in context →3 occurrences in 3 verses.
Browse those occurrences →This is exact English-word usage from the canonical KJV token index, not a Strong's estimate.
These relationships come from exact verse + token-position mappings. We do not assume that one English spelling always equals one Strong's number. A single English token can also carry more than one source tag, so the Strong's-link total can exceed the number of English occurrences.
ʼĂrâm · arawm'
Aram or Syria, and its inhabitants; also the name of the son of Shem, a grandson of Nahor, and of an Israelite
Strong's KJV usage: Aram, Mesopotamia, Syria, Syrians.
Strong's first: Genesis 10:22Strong's last: 1 Chronicles 7:34
Open full H758 profile →Arám · ar-am'
Aram (i.e. Ram), an Israelite
Strong's KJV usage: :--Aram.
Strong's first: Matthew 1:3Strong's last: Luke 3:33
Open full G689 profile →Strong's data is a concordance/lexical reference layer. Scripture context controls interpretation. Lexical source data is shown separately from future TWBC editorial teaching.
1 occurrence match the current filters. Each row keeps its exact KJV token position so Original Word and TSK remain occurrence-specific.
Which was the son of Aminadab, which was the son of Aram, which was the son of Esrom, which was the son of Phares, which was the son of Juda,
Dictionary data is kept visibly separate from Scripture and from lexical Strong's data.
No Webster 1828 entry was found for this exact KJV form or its conservative base-form candidates.
Curated TWBC teaching will remain a separate editorial layer. Raw source data is never silently rewritten to force a doctrinal conclusion.