Deuteronomy 32:33
Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.
Read in context →Begin with the exact English word as it appears in the King James Bible. Follow its whole-Bible usage, book distribution, related indexed forms, Webster 1828, every occurrence, and the occurrence-specific Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek mappings behind it.
Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.
Read in context →Their throat is an open sepulchre; with their tongues they have used deceit; the poison of asps is under their lips:
Read in context →2 occurrences in 2 verses.
Browse those occurrences →This is exact English-word usage from the canonical KJV token index, not a Strong's estimate.
These relationships come from exact verse + token-position mappings. We do not assume that one English spelling always equals one Strong's number. A single English token can also carry more than one source tag, so the Strong's-link total can exceed the number of English occurrences.
pethen · peh'-then
an asp (from its contortions)
Strong's KJV usage: adder.
Strong's first: Deuteronomy 32:33Strong's last: Job 20:16
Open full H6620 profile →aspís · as-pece'
a buckler (or round shield); used of a serpent (as coiling itself), probably the "asp"
Strong's KJV usage: :--asp.
Strong's first: Romans 3:13Strong's last: Romans 3:13
Open full G785 profile →Strong's data is a concordance/lexical reference layer. Scripture context controls interpretation. Lexical source data is shown separately from future TWBC editorial teaching.
1 occurrence match the current filters. Each row keeps its exact KJV token position so Original Word and TSK remain occurrence-specific.
Their wine is the poison of dragons, and the cruel venom of asps.
Dictionary data is kept visibly separate from Scripture and from lexical Strong's data.
'ASP,
ASPAL'ATHUS, noun A plant.
Noah Webster, An American Dictionary of the English Language (1828). A conservative base-form lookup may be used when the exact inflected KJV form is not a Webster headword.
Curated TWBC teaching will remain a separate editorial layer. Raw source data is never silently rewritten to force a doctrinal conclusion.