Exodus 17:10
So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek: and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill.
Read in context →Begin with the exact English word as it appears in the King James Bible. Follow its whole-Bible usage, book distribution, related indexed forms, Webster 1828, every occurrence, and the occurrence-specific Hebrew/Aramaic/Greek mappings behind it.
So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek: and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill.
Read in context →And next unto them repaired Rephaiah the son of Hur, the ruler of the half part of Jerusalem.
Read in context →6 occurrences in 6 verses.
Browse those occurrences →This is exact English-word usage from the canonical KJV token index, not a Strong's estimate.
These relationships come from exact verse + token-position mappings. We do not assume that one English spelling always equals one Strong's number. A single English token can also carry more than one source tag, so the Strong's-link total can exceed the number of English occurrences.
Chûwr · khoor
Chur, the name of four Israelites and one Midianite
Strong's KJV usage: Hur.
Strong's first: Exodus 17:10Strong's last: Nehemiah 3:9
Open full H2354 profile →Ben-Chûwr · ben-khoor'
Ben-Chur, an Israelite
Strong's KJV usage: the son of Hur.
Strong's first: 1 Kings 4:8Strong's last: 1 Kings 4:8
Open full H1133 profile →Strong's data is a concordance/lexical reference layer. Scripture context controls interpretation. Lexical source data is shown separately from future TWBC editorial teaching.
1 occurrence match the current filters. Each row keeps its exact KJV token position so Original Word and TSK remain occurrence-specific.
And these are their names: The son of Hur, in mount Ephraim:
Dictionary data is kept visibly separate from Scripture and from lexical Strong's data.
No Webster 1828 entry was found for this exact KJV form or its conservative base-form candidates.
Curated TWBC teaching will remain a separate editorial layer. Raw source data is never silently rewritten to force a doctrinal conclusion.